Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
|
Session Overview |
Date: Friday, 10/Sept/2021 | |||||
11:00 CEST | Trach A_1: Track A: Survey Research: Advancements in Online and Mobile Web Surveys |
Track A_2: Track A: Survey Research: Advancements in Online and Mobile Web Surveys |
Track B: Data Science: From Big Data to Smart Data |
Track C: Politics, Public Opinion, and Communication |
Track D: Digital Methods in Applied Research |
11:00 - 12:00 CEST | A4.1: Respondent Behavior and Data Quality I Chair: Florian Keusch, University of Mannheim, Germany Satisficing Behavior across Time: Assessing Negative Panel Conditioning Using a Randomized Experiment 1: GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany; 2: Utrecht University, Department of Methodology and Statistics, Netherlands; 3: ZPID - Leibniz-Institute for Psychology, Germany Consistency in straightlining across waves in the Understanding Society longitudinal survey University of Southampton, United Kingdom Effects of ‘Simple Language’ on Data Quality in Web Surveys GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany |
A4.2: Scale and Question Format Chair: Bella Struminskaya, Utrecht University, Netherlands, The Investigating Direction Effects Across Rating Scales with Five and Seven Points in a Probability-based Online Panel 1: University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany; 2: University of Gießen, Germany Serious Tinder Research: Click vs. Swipe mechanism in mobile implicit research 1: HTW Berlin, Germany; 2: LINK Marketing Services AG, Switzerland; 3: GapFish GmbH, Germany; 4: pangea labs GmbH, Germany The effects of the number of items per screen in mixed-device web surveys TU Darmstadt, Germany |
B4: Social Media Data Chair: Stefan Oglesby, data IQ AG, Switzerland Accessing in-app social media advertising data: Measuring deployment and success of ads with real participant’s data on smartphones 1: Murmuras, Germany; 2: University of Bonn, Germany; 3: Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany; 4: TH Köln, Germany Public attitudes to linking survey and Twitter data 1: NatCen Social Research, United Kingdom; 2: Cardiff University, United Kingdom; 3: University of Essex, United Kingdom Estimating Individual Socioeconomic Status of Twitter Users The London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom |
C4: Web Tracking of News Exposure Chair: Pirmin Stöckle, University of Mannheim, Germany Post post-broadcast democracy? News exposure in the age of online intermediaries 1: GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany; 2: Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz; 3: University of Hohenheim Populist Alternative News Use during Election Times in Germany University of Mannheim, Germany Explaining voting intention through online news consumption 1: respondi SAS, France; 2: respondi SAS, France; université paris-nanterre, France |
D4: Podiumsdiskussion "16 Tage vor der Bundestagswahl – Die Rolle der Demoskopie für Wahlen" Chair: Holger Geißler, marktforschung.de, Germany (in German) Programmpartner: marktforschung.de Teilnehmer*innen: Prof. Dr. Carsten Reinemann, LMU München Dr. Yvonne Schroth, Mitglied des Vorstands der Forschungsgruppe Wahlen e.V. Prof. Dr. Oliver Strijbis, SNF Förderungsprofessor am Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Universität Zürich Wahlen e.V. |
12:00 - 12:10 CEST | Break |
||||
12:10 - 1:10 CEST | Keynote 2 Analytics at its Limit: How the Pandemic Challenges Data Journalism, Forces New Formats and Reveals Blind Spots Der Spiegel, Germany |
||||
1:10 - 1:30 CEST | Break |
||||
1:30 - 2:30 CEST | A5.1: Respondent Behavior and Data Quality II Chair: Otto Hellwig, respondi/DGOF, Germany Looking up answers to political knowledge questions: the use of different instructions and measures for respondent behavior 1: GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany; 2: University of Mannheim; 3: University of Duisburg-Essen; 4: RECSM-Universitat Pompeu Fabra Better late than not at all? A systematic review on late responding in (web) surveys 1: Swiss Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training SFIVET, Switzerland; 2: University of Konstanz The impact of perceived and actual respondent burden on response quality: Findings from a randomized web survey GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany |
A5.2: Survey Invitation Methodology Chair: Florian Keusch, University of Mannheim, Germany Comparing SMS and postcard reminders Ipsos MORI, United Kingdom Evaluating probability-based Text message panel survey methodology 1: SSRS, United States of America; 2: SSRS, United States of America Expansion of an Australian probability-based online panel using ABS, IVR and SMS push-to-web The Social Research Centre, Australia |
B5: Turning Unstructured Data into Insight (with Machine Learning) Chair: Stefan Oglesby, data IQ AG, Switzerland The Economics of Superstars: Inequalities of Visibility in the World of Online-Communication 1: Beck et al. GmbH, Germany; 2: IMWF Institut für Management- und Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH Data Fusion for Better Insights: A medley of Conjoint and Time Series data SKIM, Germany Contextualizing word embeddings with semi-structured interviews Bielefeld University, Germany |
C5: Inequalities and Political Participation Chair: Anna Rysina, Kantar GmbH, Germany Representativeness in Research: How Well Do Online Samples Represent People of Color in the US? Ipsos Public Affairs, United States of America Does context matter? Exploring inequality patterns of youth political participation in Greece University of Crete, Greece Mobile Device Dependency in Everyday Life: Internet Use and Outcomes 1: University of Oxford, United Kingdom; 2: University of Ljubljana, Slovenia |
D5: Qualität in der Online-Forschung Chair: Alexandra Wachenfeld-Schell, GIM Gesellschaft für Innovative Marktforschung mbH, Germany Chair: Cathleen M. Stützer, TU Dresden, Germany (in German) Qualität und (nicht-)probabilistische Stichproben: "Über 'Repräsentativität' und 'Fitness-for-Purpose' in Online Panel Daten" University of Mannheim, Germany Qualität und Social Media: "Potenziale und Herausforderungen der Survey-Rekrutierung seltener Populationen über soziale Medien" Bielefeld University, Germany Qualität und Erfolgsmessung: "Aufmerksamkeit in der Informationssystem-Erfolgsmessung in professionellen Praxisgemeinschaften" RWTH Aachen, Germany |
2:30 - 2:40 CEST | Break |
||||
2:40 - 3:00 CEST | GOR Award Ceremony Chair: Bella Struminskaya, Utrecht University, Netherlands, The This Years Awards Sponsors: GOR Best Practice Award 2021 - respondi GOR Poster Award 2021 - GIM GOR Thesis Award 2021 - Tivian DGOF Best Paper Award 2021 - Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID) |
||||
3:00 - 3:10 CEST | Break |
||||
3:10 - 4:20 CEST | A6.1: Social Media Sampling Chair: Otto Hellwig, respondi/DGOF, Germany Using Facebook for Comparative Survey Research: Customizing Facebook Tools and Advertisement Content University of Glasgow, United Kingdom Trolls, bots, and fake interviews in online survey research: Lessons learned from recruitment via social media Bielefeld University, Germany Using Social Networks to Recruit Health Professionals for a Web Survey GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany |
A6.2: Web Probing and Survey Design Chair: Florian Keusch, University of Mannheim, Germany What is the optimal design of multiple probes implemented in web surveys? GESIS, Germany Analysis of Open-text Time Reference Web Probes on a COVID-19 Survey National Center for Health Statistics Reducing Respondent Burden with Efficient Survey Invitation Design University of Manchester, United Kingdom Recruitment to a probability-based panel: question positioning, staggering information, and allowing people to say they’re ‘not sure’ NatCen, United Kingdom |
A6.3: Voice Recording in Surveys Chair: Bella Struminskaya, Utrecht University, Netherlands, The Willingness to provide voice-recordings in the LISS panel 1: Utrecht University, Netherlands; 2: University of Waterloo, Canada Audio and voice inputs in mobile surveys: Who prefers these communication channels, and why? 1: GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany; 2: University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany; 3: Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Research and Expertise Centre for Survey Methodology, Barcelona, Spain Effect of Explicit Voice-to-Text Instructions on Unit Nonresponse and Measurement Errors in a General Population Web Survey University of Michigan, United States of America |
A6.4: Representativity in Online Panels Chair: Ines Schaurer, City of Mannheim, Germany Investigating self-selection bias of online surveys on COVID-19 pandemic-related outcomes and health characteristics GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany Relationships between variables in probability-based and nonprobability online panels University of Mannheim, Germany Sampling in Online Surveys in Latin America: Assessing Matching vs. "Black Box" Approaches 1: Vanderbilt University; 2: Agora Verkehrswende |
|
4:20 - 5:00 CEST | Fare Well Drinks |
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address: Privacy Statement · Conference: GOR 21 |
Conference Software - ConfTool Pro 2.6.135 © 2001 - 2020 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany |